I’m catching up on the news and interesting commentary about South Sudan’s ongoing independence referendum. Here are some things that caught my eye.
- A necessary secession. The nuts and bolts overview if you’re unfamiliar with what’s at stake.
- Sudan border clashes kill 36 as south votes. Violence in the Abyei region.
- Photos from the historic day. The UN Dispatch has some great pics from the first day of voting.
- What happens next? Not much actually changes, says Lee Crawfurd.
- The Referendum Hangover. Maggie Fick discusses the post-referendum issues in more detail: settling the status of the Abyei region, figuring out the sharing of oil revenues, and (oh yeah) demarcating the actual border.
- Breakaway Somaliland hooked on Sudan referendum. Why Somalia’s breakaway province is interested in South Sudan’s pending independence.
- Sudan referendum: what to watch. Laura Seay (Texas in Africa) expresses concerns over the future of the Southern Sudanese state, and provides a list of other interesting links.
- And then there was George Clooney, who has sparked quite a debate among the development blogs with his advocacy of a project to watch for genocide by satellite. Here’s a summary of the project, some characteristically snarky criticism from @laurenist, coverage of the controversy from Joshua Keating in Foreign Policy, and a defense of Clooney from Jenny Stefanotti.
On a related note, Mahmood Mamdani (Columbia) and Salah Hassan (Cornell) are both African intellectuals who challenge the framing of the conflict in Darfur as genocide. See http://www.lrb.co.uk/v29/n05/mahmood-mamdani/the-politics-of-naming-genocide-civil-war-insurgency, http://blackagendareport.com/?q=content%2Fwhats-really-happening-darfur-interview-mahmood-mamdani or http://www.cornellpress.cornell.edu/cup_detail.taf?ti_id=5595 for example. As Mamdani points out, the framing matters because an accurate diagnosis is paramount for the prescription to work.
Posted by tayamikila | January 27, 2011, 2:42 am